This page was written to expound upon an internet graphic made in haste during February 2020. Those comments stand, but I will opine further now that the time is available to do so.

  Click to view
It involves an insight I had in 2012 regarding so-called "anti-gravity". The last thing I had intended back then was to get into the second-guessing of UFO experts business, but here we are. I didn't think in terms of a "signature" at the time, but certainly believed that if UFOs were ever found to have a measurable exhaust trail or wake, those might look like pumped ambient light. Now it appears that at least some of them do.

Reverse-engineering UFOs (aka UAP, "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena") was not the plan, but an accidental afterthought. So when I became aware of the "Five Observables" list last year, sirens, bells and whistles went off. "Of course they have glowing auras of cold light," I was shouting at the "Unidentified" TV show like a loon. And the thing is, it looks like I was pretty damn right then, well before, now and probably later. I am about to get very glib, but straight to the point. The "Five Observables", using the preferred UFO-hunting nomenclature, to me are indeed "prosaic", i.e., "The Five Utterly Predictables".

In my opinion, those objects are simply light-pumping and creating "light bubbles". They are essentially floating around with a little pulse in-or-out here and there to "stop", "steer" or change "speed". Glib again, right? Sorry, but I've been carrying this around for eight years and sometimes it is what it is, so you just have to tell it that way. Hence, some of the already heavily-edited gut reactions and colorful colloquialisms that will follow.

Back in 2012, the kindly light of intuition led the way to understanding the fundamental principle involved. Reasoning described it and shaped it into plain language. Science and math aided the reasoning and maintain the bookkeeping to the extent they are presently able. They are at best secondary to understanding the underlying principle. You are not going to pocket-protector your way into this kind of breakthrough. Sorry. If so, talented people would have done it that way already. The science is easy anyway, once it is reimagined in its essence, "dumbed-down" to plain language like this, so it can be understood and recalled efficiently. Thinking about "orders of magnitude" covers most of the math. You know how, anecdotally at least, isolated tribes don't fully grasp what "3+4" is, but they know damn well it's more than "5"? We're mostly at that point with powers of ten like these, "10^-35", "10^123". So it isn't fully grasped how seemingly continuous, yet discretely Plancked-up time, infinitesimally weak but unimaginably innumerable force carriers, gargantuan and slowly lumbering woozy wavy hydrogen atoms, titanic clumps of mountain range graphane molecules and unbelievably gigantic planet-sized photons might interact within those relationships. The pieces are there, but the whole scenario isn't. If you're not making deals that amount to "7" in life, why the hell would you care about it? You have to back-fit the moving parts the first time through, so you can then "calculate" what a child can easily see. You can read about all that stuff elsewhere on my webpages and tweets.

The February graphic was based on a webpage some of you are already familiar with, which I surmise is based on U.S. government's declassified findings and those of their contractors. Let me take a moment to thank the To The Stars Academy Of Arts & Sciences (TTSA) for bringing this specific aspect of their ongoing disclosure project to light. Without them, I suspect these succinct and astute observations may well be still buried in a certain contractor's bunker somewhere and not out on the airwaves for hacks such as myself to confirm their biases, shout at the TV and exploit for their own advantage. Thank you.

From: To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science: Five Characteristics Unique to UAP's

"The five observables can be categorized as follows:

1. Sudden and instantaneous acceleration:

Objects moving in such a manner that they are capable of maneuvering suddenly, deliberately and sometimes in the opposite direction. In some cases, these maneuvers involve a change in direction and acceleration that is well beyond the healthy limitations of any biological system, that we are aware of, to withstand. The anticipated effects of these g-forces on material may even defy our current technological ability to manufacture.

Gravity, inertia and g-forces are mitigated by these objects with an overwhelming loss of mass-equivalent, i.e., light pumped through their mass. Call it "anti-gravity", inertial mass reduction or whatever. You can even start out by thinking about as using light for "thrust" and increased momentum. I went through that stage, too. In any case, ultimately the objects are floating in propelling light bubbles around a moving planet and its gravitational field, which accelerates mass. So a biological entity within should feel like they are sitting in a La-Z-Boy chair literally watching the world go by. "Opposite direction", as used here, is almost meaningless. What's "anticipated" are materials that are not directly interacting with air or water, and therefore remain unaffected by their associated inertia, friction, drag or gravity. Air and water each have light moving through them, as do the unidentified objects which exploit that plentiful and readily-available resource. It's even easier in space, which is mostly terahertz radiation, an ocean of light. The objects may be only a few wavelengths away from the nearest air or water molecule at times, and that may well be sufficient. Certainly, there is no need to interact chemically, mechanically or acoustically with things like dirty, dusty ol' Earth air or water when they can be held at bay. As for materials, Vantablack absorbers, graphene waveguides, with graphane for the consolidators and emitters is probably a good place to learn how to pump light like the big kids. Residual concern about "g-forces" and "force" generally tells me that someone is still understandably coming at this problem in precisely the wrong way, like a present-day human being. You are never going to out-force nature, but only learn its rules about how to smooth things over, straighten things out and cooperate. No wonder you're stumped. Dump the thrustiness, so-called "hard" science and tough guy spittle-spewing "force" attitude that comes with rockets and jets. You want to float like a butterfly. Or else you'll get stung by the bees.

2. Hypersonic velocities without signatures:

Objects that are traveling well above supersonic speeds and yet leave no obvious signature behind. Specific signatures normally include acoustic, heat, and electromagnetic and are traditionally recognized as a sonic boom, vapor contrails, and atmospheric ionization. Currently, even the world’s most advanced military and reconnaissance aircraft have detectible signatures.

This observable grates on me the most. It's gotta be the most insidest-the-box, deep inside the deepest bunker government no-bid contractor Beltway cheese PowerPoint bullet-point logic of all time. All it needs is coffee and a donut.

Those glowing cold auras are the signatures.

The signatures for ambient light-pumping have apparently been detected but seemingly not recognized, i.e., "glowing auras" and "cold light" spheres. We are looking right at it. If you don't see a signature you know, maybe you don't know the signature. Sorry, but this just burns me. Pretend John Hancock signed in Chinese. I can't read it either, but it sure looks like a signature. Put down the laser pointer and find a flippin translator. You are the sharpest minds working for the greatest country. Next time, figure out, or at least look around and ask how an unknown non-signature signature might become a known-known signature by being exactly what it is. Find the Jeff Goldblum character, or at least take a walk around the block. Please.

On the upside, this demonstrates how reason easily leaves science in the dust, every time, and always will.

What could possibly make one think UFO signatures would be what's expected, and not what's observed? Perhaps an advanced propulsion system wouldn't conform to the current prevailing notions of what they should be like. Ultimately, I imagine they've had this thought in the bunker as well, so why not come out and say so, even at this point? People out here are telling you what it is. A simple Google search can find me very easily, and it's been that way for years. The underlying principle is not a secret and never was, or could be. The engineering to execute better than the next guy is where the competitive challenge lies. The call is coming from inside the house. So you better wake up in there.

This stuff could not be more obvious. Ask yourself why. Bite a donut and say "it is what it is". This time you'll be right and will have had a productive meeting. At the end of the day.

/rant

3. Low observability:

Regardless if the object is being viewed electro-optically, electromagnetically, or through the naked eye, the inability to gain a clear target picture remains elusive. Descriptions by witnesses are often difficult to describe, while radar returns often come back nonsensical or even jammed. Objects generally appear opaque and semi-metallic in nature, both on camera and live. In many cases it is nearly impossible to actually see the object and instead reports often include what is seen “around” the object.

The objects are apparently using ambient light such as VIS, IR, radar, and likely terahertz frequencies in space to propel themselves. Things like radar might get sucked into the skin to be pumped and come right back out again as radar, white light, the precise blue of the sky that day, BOB FM, a metallic-looking thing with lights on it, heat, 1010 WINS, strobing disco lights, terahertz space coldness or WSB-TV. Using the same frequencies the objects breathe to observe them will necessarily cause distortion, because the signature is indeed "around" the object which is probably capable of adjusting to whatever configuration is most efficient at the time. Blowing-up stored heat, or stored anything, is over as the predominate technology, even for the shaved apes, at least in my opinion. The semi-metallic appearance is likely grayish or silvery from black and white (absorbing and emitting) cells being intermingled or interchangeable, which makes perfect sense. Also, as I've said elsewhere, they are likely spiraling, spinning and undulating every available frequency in, through, out and around themselves in what may or may not seem like a haphazard manner. So, what you are looking at visibly may be the mirror image of other side of what you think you are seeing. Radar might return multiple images of whomever sent it. You'll get TV on the radio, rotating "glare", Mr. Stay Puft, cats, dogs and the rest of it.

4. Trans-medium travel:

Objects that have the ability to travel easily in various environments and conditions seemingly without any change in performance capabilities. Our current understanding of physics requires vehicles to be designed specifically according to their application. For this reason, there are stark differences between those vehicles that orbit in space, fly in the atmosphere, and travel in the sea. Objects that can travel in all three mediums using the same design and without compromising performance or degrading lift remains an enigma.

Light, the full spectrum, is the medium and common to space, air and water. Air, water and objects in space are simply what's in the medium. The unidentified objects absorb and emit, i.e., pump, the medium. There is a layer of pushed and pulled light surrounding them, bubbles or "auras". They do not directly interact with air, water or anything other than light. Once you understand that much and start internalizing its ramifications, and I suspect at least some of you might be after a year of me spamming this stuff, it's almost all downhill. They are not in different environments, it's just that different stuff is in the environment. It's like a Disney World ride with the seawater around Maui there, singing banjo bears over here and space mountains dead ahead. But the rail you are riding on does not change. That rail is light. (And it can go fast, too.)

When this stuff does snap into place for you, reader, and it will, imagine living and breathing this for eight years, then seeing these "observables" pop-up on TV one day. Your hair might catch on fire.

It's all about the engineering now. Whether you are ready to admit it or not, others will.

5. Positive lift:

Objects that are apparently resisting the natural effects of Earth's gravity, yet without the normally associated aerodynamic means for lift and thrust. These objects have no obvious signs of propulsion (engines, propellers, exhaust plumes, etc.) or flight surfaces (wings, rudders, ailerons, fins, etc.), but yet they are able to move in a very precise manner in our atmosphere despite not having any of those characteristics."

The objects are not resisting gravity, merely freeing themselves in a manner akin to "smoothing", "disentangling", "straightening" or "flattening" it with light. Read my webpages, tweets and Twitter Moments for a view that the mechanism probably has to do with simply untangling and smoothing gravitons, which together can act as waves, "acceleration" or densities. If you go through self-aligned gravitons horizontally, instead of vertically, that's probably what's called "inertia". We can bicker about the minutiae of that later, but it won't change the ultimate reality. The simple truth of the insight remains. When you can move photons through your body and skin in a "precise manner", then it's time to start putting things like "ailerons" into museums, history books and hobby shops. And finally again, calmly this time, the signatures arguably are quite obvious.

Okay, boiling-over slide rule nerds, settle down. I've had my smartass say and will get over it, just like you will. This is where you come in and take over. Very generally, radiant flux over mass-density is where we're headed. Your assignment is, how much and and how fast can the lightest thing we can build spacecrafts from absorb and emit, to wit, pump light efficiently, in order to smooth gravity for mass in space, air, water and wherever. I've given you a head start, and haven't spilled all my beans, but urge you to get busy outwitting each other. Also, materials will probably happen that surpass what I've proposed as a start, maybe more of a pure waveguide, but with some kind of longer-term storage I haven't had time to fully envision. So get busy thinking about those. Meantime, you physicists come up with some equations to soothe the savage mouth-breathers, because what you have now is insufficient. The sooner the better, so we can all move on.

Conclusion

It's no enigma, folks. We can do this.

There might be more to it than pumping ambient light in a general sense, as I have proposed. But why would there be? Sometimes it "is what it is" and we're looking right at it.

That self-promoting stuff said, I want to be clear that I do not rule out any other explanations for these observables, although I like some more than others. Some of the things people are proposing seem very plausible to me on an intuitive level. And although I don't fully understand them, I think they may be able to push the implementation of my concept beyond even the speed of light. In a universe expanding this quickly, something will.

Other things out there, I don't favor as much. I don't see how one can just math it out on a blank piece of paper or a green chalkboard. Certainly, I couldn't. What I see is, that's the kind of thing done after the Montgolfiers, Goddards, Wrights (and possibly the Kellys) get things moving. The existing units around the current archetypes are mostly inside out and upside down anyway, because they are usually based on certain stale premises, and rarely, if ever, updated. Even after an Einstein comes up with mass-energy equivalence, educated people are still talking about "buoyancy" like we're in Ancient Greece. So you see what I'm dealing with here. Then again, compared to some of these people, I am almost a math illiterate despite my engineering background, so there's that, too. I am willing to throw elbows if needed, but aware of my limitations. Observation and reason will overcome the trivial bean-counting sophistry seen for example, at an NSF forum. So will experimentation.

Of course, I could be wrong about what these objects are doing. But I ain't wrong about what it could be, probably is, or at worst, a way to start seriously competing that is realistic and not evermore bang-booms or metric equations describing equations of metrics. I am blowing off steam here, and mean no disrespect, but it's time to get visceral until some eyes open, then I can fade away.

Light-pumping is the simplest explanation for the propulsion behind these unidentified objects and now we're seeing that signature. Minimizing that fact is ridiculous. Ignoring it for much longer might make one look like a squawking seagull. You make the call. Being the second on your block to say "I told you so right after Kelly did" is probably a better thing to be, but that's just my opinion. The same goes for Oumuamua, certain "anti-gravity" butterflies and a few other suspects to be named later. "Common sense" sometimes just plain works. Don't be afraid to understand. Did I mention that, in my case, faith and teleology sparked the intuition? I highly recommend the method, but that's for another time.

I'll be out and about more loudly with this more and more, as I will have to be for a while I suppose. I have more time to do so than before, having recently fulfilled certain duties and obligations. I'll probably be using YouTube to start, but that is still in the aspirational stage. I'm looking at the level of editor I'll need, as the free ones have a few features missing that I think I'll want. Once that learning curve is over, I won't be able to resist spouting off until adaptation of this is widely accepted as a desirable goal and it's recognized as a leading UFO propulsion theory, especially if we ever want to catch-up to (and possibly defend ourselves against) tall whites, little greens, orbs, medium-sized Vulcans, Mork, grey goblins, 3XL Guild Navigators, giant ants, the space bros, ALF and assorted lizard people.

Bryan Kelly
June 2020