|
UFO Propulsion Technology Systems, Glowing Auras, Cold Light Spheres, 'Anti-Gravity' Bubbles, UAP Signatures & The Kitchen Sink
...A Light-Pumping Mini-Manifesto |
|
These UFOs are moving in "glowing auras" of "cold light", we're told. They're seemingly floating in pulsating, luminescent bubbles and spheres. Strangely, it still seems that some of even the most astute observers seem reluctant to consider the self-evident however, that these things are obviously light pumpers. "Light" in this case almost certainly includes terahertz, in and around the very temperatures of space itself, coincidentally the very wavelengths reportedly guided through purported UFO crash materials. Some even seem to insist that the UFOs do not have a propulsion "signature", despite well-documented data and observations. Those glowing cold auras are the signatures. To me at least, it's as clear as Occam's toothbrush. What could possibly make one think UFO signatures would be what's expected, and not what's observed? Perhaps an advanced propulsion system wouldn't conform to the current prevailing notions of what they should be like. Sure, there might be more to it than pumping ambient light in a general sense, as I have proposed. But why would there be? Sometimes it "is what it is" and we're looking right at it. 
Now I'm sure that's all very interesting to everybody, but... The above conundrum explains why it's time to clearly document my opinion that these developments tend to prove my point about light-pumping, aka "anti-gravity", light bubbles or whatever nickname will eventually catch on. I.e., I'm the guy who probably knows how those UFOs work. That needs to be made clear. And no one is going to say it for me, given the prevailing rate of timidity. I came up with the ambient light-pumping idea in 2012 and have been gradually and increasingly promoting it ever since. It has not been an overnight success, nor was it be expected to be. What's one more tin foil hat on the internet? Then, 2019 happened. Yes, these UFOs are now giving me an excuse to invoke a classic instance of confirmation bias, so I'm using it. That's also how science works, or at least in the ballpark of whatever philosophy one feels like using that day. The data and observations from these things are a predicted outcome of what I have proposed. I didn't collect them however, someone else did. An informal "testable theory" of mine was: "if those UFOs were ever found to have a 'signature', it would look like ambient pumped-light." Now it appears some of them do. The Five Observables, to me, are The Five Utterly Predictables. 
Please bear with me, that's a very droll statement, I know.
But it's been over seven years now for me with this Kafkaesque dead horse and I think that's as about obnoxious as I get.
It also shows you that it's okay to think about these things that way, even if you turn out to be wrong.
They are not sacred supernatural relics to be discussed in hushed tones, just objects, like a Buick LeSabre.
If I didn't come up with this general idea about light, mass and gravity, somebody else would have eventually. If you favor the Drake Equation, maybe seven million other meatheads out there did that exact same thing, just today. I have no known super powers and am not in "contact" with anything other than the Catholic Church. Those objects are ultimately prosaic and mundane, words also used to describe lost balloons and swarming seagulls. Light-pumping propulsion is the simplest explanation and we're seeing that signature. Minimizing that fact is ridiculous. The "lens flare" crowd has more credulity and curiosity than some of these mopes. The UFOs tend to support the underlying principle in a painfully obvious manner, because of what they demonstrate and display. Spherical light bubbles are probably the "wheel" of space travel, and we're a barking dog chasing cars until we take this seriously. So why pretend? Even if the concept is not completely accurate, it's not easily falsified either, if at all. At worst, it offers a way to start competing seriously with whatever those are. Reality seems to be conforming to a Twitter tin foil hat's theory. So what? Stranger things have happened. It wouldn't be the first time. 
Prior to 2019, I had used clouds, balloons and airships as archetypes of the idea. Those were a big help with the intuitive breakthrough in the first place. Ambient light is their "signature", too, although I had never thought about it in quite those terms. I have been sporadically interested in UFOs starting as a kid in the 1960-70s "Space Age" with a copy of "Chariots" from the Northway Mall, through the Roswell years and whatever Bob Lazar tale was on TV that day, on to the Phoenix Lights, the Kecksburgs, the Rendelshams, etc., on and off, but had lost most of my steady interest by about 2010. The "Crystal Skulls" television stuff might've done that. A few years later, I got interested in 'anti-gravity' for other reasons. The science involved, mostly physics done by others, is all there for the bookkeeping. It's just somewhat out-of-order, upside-down and backward, as are certain soon-to-be-highly-irrelevant engineering units, in my opinion. Very generally, radiant flux over mass-density is where we're headed. I.e., how much light can the lightest thing we can built spacecrafts out of absorb and emit, to wit, pump light, and how fast. Light is for smoothing gravity for mass in space, air, water and wherever. It's not for bang-boom 'splodey "heat" rockets made of mostly of dead weight thrustiness, but that's another argument for another day. My webpages and articles all lead back to the basics eventually and tell the overall story. 
There is nothing astounding about this idea, except that it's so simple. It's made of a few commonly known facts that were never put together quite this way. I asked myself a lot of questions, found the answers and re-framed everything, repeatedly. When you're out in nature with the right state of mind, then read the most difficult scientific material you can find, over and over, after a while a visceral sense develops. Now with these UFOs are turning out almost exactly as I inadvertently envisioned they'd have to, that fact is worth mentioning until it's understood. I'm not going to repeat it continuously however, just post this link occasionally, as needed, so the facts are clear about where you heard it first. I won't be "big-footed" by sudden revelations from opportunists. I don't care who it is, or in what dumbass way they try to re-describe with obscurantist drivel, garbled jargon and barely comprehensible symbolism what I've already said unambiguously, intelligibly, comprehensively and plainly for years. Pleading ignorance won't work. The internet has been "forever" for a while now, so if you're even thinking about it, just don't bother. It's too late. Instead, offer collaboration. Also know this, if JPL and MIT had jointly announced this "light-pumping" idea this morning, it would be taken as gospel in minutes with little-to-no thought by the same people growling as they read this. That's human nature and understandable. Those are noted authorities and I am not. But it's not going to happen that way. Some practical thinking and acceptance will probably have to happen with that ilk first, I have no idea exactly how this will finally be mainstreamed. Sure, I could* possibly even be wrong. I know that, but that would be of little consequence in this instance, i.e., one more tin foil hat. Or maybe "it is what it is" with these things, and I was right about that all along. That seems far more likely at this point, doesn't it? 
On occasion, uncomfortable self-promotion is required in this life, such as when things seem this painfully obvious and it's time to speak up.
I am not looking forward to that sideshow, but will pursue it as needed until it's no longer needed, because there is an underlying goal behind all this.
For now, just understand that much.
This little write-up may be linked when a "who the hell is this guy?" comes up when discussing these things, especially with foot-draggers who should know better. Because I'm the guy who probably knows how those UFOs probably move, and has been saying it for years. Now you know, too. Bryan Kelly December 2019 |
