November 22, 2019



Inoculating An Idea Against The Future - The Light-Pumping Principle



I take no pleasure in writing this, but in this world, such things are sometimes necessary.

What I'm doing here is inoculating the idea described below from future revelations and announcements from those with a bigger footprint. I'll simply use a link to this page as a quick response. Rather than reiterating tiresome justifications in the future, it will have already been done.

As far as I know, I am the first and only person to suggest pumping light for propulsion. You heard about that here first, no matter how it's been re-framed. I like to keep things understandable and describe what's popularly called "anti-gravity" as light-pumping, i.e., mass-equivalence reducing mass over time in a gravitational field. I envision an object continuously achieving that by pumping overwhelming amounts of comparatively gravity-resistant, mass-equivalent light through itself. It's a mind-numbingly simple intuitive principle. That's probably why "science" hasn't seen it holistically, despite describing the sums of its parts. Anyway, whether you call it "inertial mass reduction", "anti-gravity" or something else, light-pumping is going to turn out to be dead right, in my opinion. It's why this page seems like a wise precaution.

You can read about the idea in detail elsewhere, this writing will not explain it any further, only position it.

That said, I could be wrong and ridiculous. It was an idea I developed in 2012 and have been refining ever since. Recent UFO developments have changed things, as more and more mainstream types, e.g., the US Navy, are willing to discuss unidentified objects which just so happen to nearly mirror what I have been suggesting on my webpages, LinkedIn, Twitter and elsewhere for years now. To me, the US Navy UFOs are almost, but not quite, unfalsifiable archetypes like clouds, balloons and airships. I imagine others are having the same thoughts about now, "Uh, that guy was right." The UFOs exhibit cold light auras and move exactly as I'd expect them to. Call it confirmation bias, I don't care. Years ago I wrote about how to do these things and am seeing it now happening in detail; "of course it's cold light." Bear in mind, I don't insist it "has" to be happening "only" with light-pumping, but then again, it probably is. So these recent developments may make it seem more and more palatable for some to suddenly start getting some very clever ideas in this regard, which will look quite familiar to me. They might be opportunistic aerospace organizations, UFO researchers, breakthrough propulsion types or perhaps academicians. It's just how human nature works, and it has to be acknowledged. That's all I'm doing here, and I take no joy in it. I hope I never have to use this page, but here it is.

I should add that, even if those Navy UFOs don't operate exactly as I've described, I would suggest that there is no better way to compete with those kinds of capabilities at this time. What I describe is intelligible and achievable. Humans can do that sort of thing, if they haven't already. My purpose is to make that happen.

If any suddenly-released double-secret stuff is highly persuasive of a prior art, I'll admit it. It is entirely possible that others have thought of this. But I'm basically staking a claim and discouraging any feeble attempts at cheap imitations down the road.

The final push is starting. I can't give it 100% as of this writing, but that time will come. The way I see it, I'm seven years into a typical ten year overnight sensation. Or it's possibly a complete joke, but I highly doubt that. Anyone interested in getting involved (having seen this beforehand) might want to think about taking action now, because some things can only happen once. This is probably one of them.

I may be wrong and ultimately make a fool of myself here, but that's inconsequential. I'm not in a position where that matters. I value the good opinion of others, but my reputation or that of any organization are not at stake, a good scenario. So I will use that to be outspoken when the time comes. If I turn out to be a tin foil hat on this issue, so what? It wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong, and I'm the type that can be at ease with making my best good faith efforts made at the time and missing the mark. On the other hand, what if the light bubble is the new wheel? That's something I'd have to protect, but maybe not for the most obvious of reasons.

As an aside, inquiries from bold, alert first-movers are encouraged. If you care enough to have even read this before it had to be used for its intended purpose, you might be perfect. It'll happen anyway, with or without you. So why not indulge your curiosity? Nature can't be ignored. Now is the time to self-select or be prepared to be left in the dust.

Why should humanity continue to flounder, fruitlessly fighting with gravity by flailing about with mindless brute force? This approach is about achieving freedom using logic and reason.

It's about cooperating with creation, whose author you'll never outwit. When you do that, questions start answering themselves.

Bryan Kelly